<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Epiphanies and a Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smarthistory.org/blog/231/two-epiphanies-and-a-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smarthistory.org/blog/231/two-epiphanies-and-a-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Our Thoughts on Teaching &#38; Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art History Newsletter : Smarthistory</title>
		<link>http://smarthistory.org/blog/231/two-epiphanies-and-a-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-39685</link>
		<dc:creator>Art History Newsletter : Smarthistory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarthistory.org/blog/?p=231#comment-39685</guid>
		<description>[...] are academics and the creators of smarthistory.org, where they also maintain a blog. In one recent entry, they contrast Stanley Fish&#8217;s recent obit for the humanities with the Digital Humanities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are academics and the creators of smarthistory.org, where they also maintain a blog. In one recent entry, they contrast Stanley Fish&#8217;s recent obit for the humanities with the Digital Humanities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juliana</title>
		<link>http://smarthistory.org/blog/231/two-epiphanies-and-a-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-38784</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarthistory.org/blog/?p=231#comment-38784</guid>
		<description>Peter - 
These are great identifications for the Höch photomontage...all of my (or should I say &quot;our&quot;) knowledge (correct or not) about the image comes from a lot of looking and reading—and now, because of these website podcasts, Flickr photos, Twitter posts, and blogging, we&#039;re incorporating social networking into the learning model for art history! This is one of the goals of Smarthistory, so I guess we&#039;re…scoring? Winning? Maybe everyone wins with this.

One of the best parts of Smarthistory is our emphasis on participatory learning. To that end, we&#039;re modifying our site to enable visitor contributions and commentary. Such changes, of course, do not happen as instantaneously as we&#039;d like: in the meantime, however, what would be ideal is for you to visit the Hannah Höch Flickr page [http://www.flickr.com/photos/32535532@N07/3179940950/in/pool-smarthistory] and do some notations on the image! Wouldn&#039;t it be great if we could identify all the figures in the piece? I&#039;m sure one or two scholars have already done all that hard work, and you also have some great factoids to add, but I&#039;ve never seen her fantastic work mapped out completely, with everything and everyone identified for all to see—and don&#039;t you think it should be done here?!? Flickr may not be perfect for this undertaking, but it&#039;s a great start…so go for it! Make notes, write comments, and contribute!

And if anyone else has more info for Höch&#039;s &quot;Cut with the Kitchen Knife,&quot; please add what you can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8211;<br />
These are great identifications for the Höch photomontage&#8230;all of my (or should I say &#8220;our&#8221;) knowledge (correct or not) about the image comes from a lot of looking and reading—and now, because of these website podcasts, Flickr photos, Twitter posts, and blogging, we&#8217;re incorporating social networking into the learning model for art history! This is one of the goals of Smarthistory, so I guess we&#8217;re…scoring? Winning? Maybe everyone wins with this.</p>
<p>One of the best parts of Smarthistory is our emphasis on participatory learning. To that end, we&#8217;re modifying our site to enable visitor contributions and commentary. Such changes, of course, do not happen as instantaneously as we&#8217;d like: in the meantime, however, what would be ideal is for you to visit the Hannah Höch Flickr page [http://www.flickr.com/photos/32535532@N07/3179940950/in/pool-smarthistory] and do some notations on the image! Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if we could identify all the figures in the piece? I&#8217;m sure one or two scholars have already done all that hard work, and you also have some great factoids to add, but I&#8217;ve never seen her fantastic work mapped out completely, with everything and everyone identified for all to see—and don&#8217;t you think it should be done here?!? Flickr may not be perfect for this undertaking, but it&#8217;s a great start…so go for it! Make notes, write comments, and contribute!</p>
<p>And if anyone else has more info for Höch&#8217;s &#8220;Cut with the Kitchen Knife,&#8221; please add what you can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://smarthistory.org/blog/231/two-epiphanies-and-a-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-38760</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smarthistory.org/blog/?p=231#comment-38760</guid>
		<description>Good points. Snow day here today. No snow days online. Started putting lectures on itunesu last spring. NB: Just listened to the discussion on &quot;Cut With the Kitchen Knife.&quot; Pretty good. But, after saying it&#039;s so chaotic, you all point out (some) of the organization. It&#039;s very organized, composed, as is all of her work. Also, no Karl Liebknecht in it (that&#039;s a guy named Trost, speaking at a rally of sailors), or (here to the Flickr site) Walter Rathenau (an common misidentification, probably the hardest one in the work) but an obscure artistocrat. Watch for my forthcoming book &quot;Objects as History in 20th-Century German Art (California, 2010), which offers in one of its studies a new interpretation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. Snow day here today. No snow days online. Started putting lectures on itunesu last spring. NB: Just listened to the discussion on &#8220;Cut With the Kitchen Knife.&#8221; Pretty good. But, after saying it&#8217;s so chaotic, you all point out (some) of the organization. It&#8217;s very organized, composed, as is all of her work. Also, no Karl Liebknecht in it (that&#8217;s a guy named Trost, speaking at a rally of sailors), or (here to the Flickr site) Walter Rathenau (an common misidentification, probably the hardest one in the work) but an obscure artistocrat. Watch for my forthcoming book &#8220;Objects as History in 20th-Century German Art (California, 2010), which offers in one of its studies a new interpretation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
