William Butterfield had little more than 100 square feet of real estate to work with, but designed perhaps the greatest example of High Victorian Gothic architecture. The spire soars 227 feet above London and its interior is a kaleidoscope of color and pattern that expresses the vision of the Oxford Movement and the Ecclesiological Society. In 1841, the Society announced its intentions for their model church:
It must be in a Gothic Style.
It must be built of solid materials.
Its ornament should decorate its construction.
Its artist should be ‘a single pious and laborious artist alone, pondering deeply over his duty to do his best for the service of God’s Holy Religion’.
Above all the church must be built so that the “Rubricks and Canons of the Church of England may be Consistently observed, and the Sacraments rubrically and decently administered.
[0:00] [music]
Dr. Steven Zucker: [0:05] I’m with Ayla Lepine, an architectural historian from the Courtauld Institute. We’re in central London, looking at All Saints Church, Margaret Street. I thought we would explore this building as a way of understanding high Victorian Gothic architecture.
Dr. Ayla Lepine: [0:20] Standing in the courtyard, the spire, as you look up, is incredibly tall, one of the tallest in London. It was built from a group of Church of England people who were trying to restore a sense of spiritual pride for the entire nation.
Dr. Zucker: [0:35] It’s so close to us.
Dr. Lepine: [0:37] Even when this building was first conceived of in the late 1840s, this area of central London was very built up.
[0:45] And so William Butterfield, the architect, had to think very strategically about how he would include a courtyard space, a full church with a grand nave and a large sanctuary, and everything required for this wonderful manifestation of the medieval world brought into modern London, in this really teeny-tiny confined area.
Dr. Zucker: [1:05] So the exterior of the church, these different colored bricks, this lovely deep red and then these lines of black brick, offset with this limestone.
Dr. Lepine: [1:14] This is something called structural polychromy.
Dr. Zucker: [1:16] That means that the polychromy, this decoration, is not on the surface, but is actually the materials that are supporting the building itself.
Dr. Lepine: [1:23] Being outside in this confined, riotously decorative courtyard, is foreshadowing, because we know that when we get into the church, the colors will be even more bold, even more intense, and the materials will be even more diverse.
Dr. Zucker: [1:37] This reminds me of the cathedral in Siena. There’s these alternating horizontal bands.
Dr. Lepine: [1:43] In the early 1850s, when this building was being designed, there was an incredibly important critic and writer who was working on making medieval Italy important for Victorian architects.
Dr. Zucker: [1:55] Presuming you’re speaking about Ruskin, a critic who spent a few years focusing on architecture, and was responsible for laying down a series of ideas about what true architecture should be. That the Gothic revivals to date in England had really missed the point.
Dr. Lepine: [2:11] Absolutely. What he believes is that in order to build honestly, and to build sensitively for a new age, you have to look back to the past, and instead of looking back to England’s past specifically, he looks back to continental Europe — both in terms of materials and techniques and in terms of a sense of medieval piety.
Dr. Zucker: [2:31] So there was a sense that there was a authentic life that had been lost in our new industrial culture?
Dr. Lepine: [2:37] Certainly, and Ruskin was also a major critic of industrialization.
Dr. Zucker: [2:40] But it’s one thing to have a theorist, a critic, developing these ideas. It’s another thing to have them made real, to find somebody who’s willing to put up the money, to find people who want to worship in that kind of environment. What’s happening in England that allows for this to actually come to fruition?
Dr. Lepine: [2:55] In the 1830s, something called the Oxford Movement begins, unimaginatively enough, in Oxford, with a small group of academics who are convinced that the Church of England really needs to be revivified, and they look to times before the Reformation.
Dr. Zucker: [3:12] So looking back to Catholic traditions.
Dr. Lepine: [3:15] Even earlier, to the Church Fathers, who were in the first centuries of Christianity, and it starts off as a very intellectual movement. It’s about theology, but then later in the 1830s, a group of men in Cambridge begin to think about how art and architecture of the Middle Ages can help to promote that earlier Oxford vision.
[3:33] It comes out of those two universities, and eventually that group in Cambridge become The Ecclesiological Society.
Dr. Zucker: [3:40] They’re ideological sponsors of this building.
Dr. Lepine: [3:42] Like A.J. Beresford Hope, who’s also a politician and who’s a very important writer and thinker in his own right, who puts up the money to create All Saints, Margaret Street behind us.
Dr. Zucker: [3:52] All right. Well, let’s go in and take a look.
[3:53] We’ve walked into the church. It’s a beautiful, quiet, dark space. I’m seeing inlaid stone and tile, so how is image and ritual related?
Dr. Lepine: [4:04] This building is certainly about the Word and it’s about scripture, but it’s also about the east end of the building, it’s about the sanctuary. It’s much more focused on what happens on the high altar, on the bread and the wine and on what’s called the revelation of Christ to humanity.
[4:21] It’s about meeting God in a much more multi-sensory, full-body way, and that’s so much of the reason why the visual is so important and telling stories is so important in this building.
Dr. Zucker: [4:32] Well the Eucharist does seem like the perfect fulcrum of these ideas, the spiritual made physical. This is a sensory kaleidoscope.
Dr. Lepine: [4:40] The ornament and the pattern is most concentrated at the east end of the church, where the altar is, and also a low but very heavy stone screen, which is inspired by John Ruskin’s ideas in “The Stones of Venice,” which seems in one way to separate the congregation from all the special things that are happening in the sanctuary where the bread and wine will be broken and then distributed, but it also highlights it.
Dr. Zucker: [5:06] That screen reminds me of Santa Sabina in Rome, that really old basilica church.
Dr. Lepine: [5:12] Because Santa Sabina is such an early example of Christian architecture, it is a real source of inspiration for Victorian architects. You were mentioning authenticity before, and what this building is trying to do is genuinely capture all the generations of Christian history right from the 1st century.
Dr. Zucker: [5:31] As we approached the east end of the church the light came in through this clerestory, and the sanctuary is now much brighter.
Dr. Lepine: [5:40] Instead of having big windows on the ground floor, they’re actually up above the main arcades on either side. We have a sense of light descending from above, with all of the kind of divine symbolism that comes along with that. It’s a very typical way of introducing light in a medieval building. Now, what we can see on the east wall is the life of Christ.
Dr. Zucker: [6:01] Very historicized. Like the building itself, this is clearly a kind of Victorian conception of 14th century Italian art.
Dr. Lepine: [6:09] In the 1840s, when this building was conceived, William Dyce, a very famous Victorian painter, was invited by the patron and by Butterfield, the architect, to paint saints and the life of Christ on the east wall. This deteriorated and soon afterwards John Ninian Comper repainted Dyce’s work in his own style. Comper loved early Italian Renaissance painting.
Dr. Zucker: [6:34] I want to go back to the artist Dyce for a moment. I’m thinking about some of Dyce’s landscape paintings, like “Pegwell Bay,” for example, which shows his family picking up perhaps shells and a kind of interest in the natural world in natural science.
[6:48] And yet to think of him in this context, painting the spiritual, there lies an interesting tension in the 19th century between the development of Darwinian thinking, geologic time, and then here, spiritual understanding, spiritual time.
Dr. Lepine: [7:03] Actually, there was a much more integrated way of thinking about God and science in the mid-Victorian period.
Dr. Zucker: [7:10] In this church there is stone that was chosen that actually includes fossils.
Dr. Lepine: [7:15] Yes. In that screen that we were talking about before. The step that everyone would have to step onto in order to get into the sanctuary and in order to participate in that giving of the bread and the wine.
[7:27] And we can also see it in the topmost element of the screen. And so the passage of geological time is present even in this most holy threshold of the building. The other place where we can see it is at the font.
Dr. Zucker: [7:40] The baptismal font. There is something that is awesome and overwhelming when one thinks about the time that this stone represents. You see the creatures that are embedded within it. The mathematical precision of science and spirituality, the infinite, come together.
Dr. Lepine: [7:55] In the mid-19th century, Victorians were struggling with what the discoveries that they were making really might mean.
[8:02] [music]