Periods of Byzantine history
The “Transitional Period”
The “Transitional Period” of Byzantine history, corresponding to the Iconoclast controversy (a dispute over the use of religious images, or “icons”), incursions by the Arabs, and an economic downturn, was not conducive to architectural production and, it seems, less conducive to the documentation of building activity. The period nevertheless accounts for dramatic and permanent changes in Byzantine religious architecture in both form and scale.
The lack of secure criteria for dating the surviving buildings has long plagued Byzantine scholarship. An earlier generation of scholars familiar with the architectural program of emperor Basil I from the Vita Basilii, viewed his reign as a formative period and consequently dated a variety of “transitional” churches in Constantinople (the capital of the Byzantine Empire) to the ninth century. None of buildings mentioned in the Vita survives, however, nor any other of the great monuments of ninth-century Constantinople. The palaces of Theophilos have similarly vanished without a trace, and only paltry foundations remain for the well-documented monasteries on the Princes’ Islands.
This period of economic downturn and loss of territory led to a decrease in pan-Mediterranean trade, a reduction in the size of cities, and a social and economic shift from urban to rural. Public ceremonies, which often incorporated the emperor and church officials—a hallmark of previous centuries—also declined, and the Byzantine liturgy became more interior, with fewer outdoor processions. Churches became smaller and more centralized, accommodating smaller congregations and a more static liturgy. In general, the decrease in the scale of church construction led to the development of new, simpler architectural designs.
As we might expect, given the importance of Hagia Sophia, domed churches predominate—following a simplified version of the grand developments of the age of Justinian. As a domed basilica, the sixth-century H. Sophia Constantinople had a dome diameter of 100 Byzantine feet; the dome of the early tenth-century Myrelaion in Constantinople, a cross-in-square church, was barely one-tenth of that (see a comparison of the plans of these two churches).
From a practical point of view, churches of different scales demanded different structural systems. For smaller churches, galleries and ambulatories were unnecessary and internal supports could be reduced to columns.
The domed basilica provided sufficient space for a larger congregation. The cross-domed church offered an effective structural design for an intermediate congregation. The cross-in-square was ideal for smaller churches with a dome less than 20 Byzantine feet in diameter. It was this smaller church type that became popular in the centuries following iconoclasm.
Refining old designs
Critical in the development may be the reconstruction of Hagia Eirene in Constantinople (Istanbul), destroyed in the earthquake of 740 and rebuilt later in the century (view plan of the reconstructed church). While retaining the domed basilica plan, it corrected the basic structural problem of its predecessor (inadequate lateral support for its dome) by adding transversal barrel vaults over the galleries so that the dome was evenly braced on all four sides, usually referred to as a cross-domed unit.
This bilaterally symmetrical system appears at the core of a variety of smaller buildings with cruciform plans, such as at the church (now known as the Atik Mustafa Paşa Mosque in Istanbul), probably constructed in the ninth century.
Many churches appear as the reconstruction or reconfiguration of older buildings; rather than representing a new theoretical model, they express the very real concerns of a society in transition. In many examples, we find the reduction in scale of an Early Christian basilica into a new church constructed on the same foundations, reemploying many of the same architectural elements, with its basic design is transformed. Indeed, H. Eirene in Constantinople is still most often discussed as a Justinianic building, although almost all of its superstructure—and its reformulated structural system—belong to the eighth century.
H. Nikolaos, Myra (Demre), rebuilt 8th century
H. Nikolaos, Myra (Demre)
Similarly, H. Nikolaos at Myra (in southern Turkey) was rebuilt in the eighth century as a domed basilica on the foundations of its Early Christian predecessor. Elements of the older building are incorporated in the atrium and south chapels. The naos, with a dome of c. 7.70 m diameter (replaced by a groin vault in the 19th-century renovation), was extended to the east and west by narrow barrel vaults and enveloped by lateral aisles and a narthex on the ground floor, with galleries above. The church also included a second aisle to the south with arcosolia, although it remains unclear which tomb belonged to Nikolaos. Additional constructions of later centuries expanded the building on all sides.
Hagia Sophia in Vize
Hagia Sophia in Vize (now Süleyman Paşa Mosque) is similar in design and may be dated sometime after 833. It seems likely that this was the episcopal church of Bizye, associated with events mentioned in the vita of St. Mary the Younger. Like Hagia Nikolaos, it reused the foundation of an older basilica. Rebuilt as a domed basilica, its plan is basilican on the ground level, while the gallery includes a cross-domed unit, like that of Hagia Eirene, with transverse barrel vaults extending over the galleries to brace a dome c. 6 m. in diameter, raised above a windowed drum.
Fatih Mosque (H. Stephanos ?), Trilye in Bithynia
The cross-in-square or four-column church type seems to have been developed in this period as well, as is well preserved in the early ninth-century Fatih Mosque (H. Stephanos ?) in Trilye in Bithynia (east of Constantinople/Istanbul). As is repeated in any number of later versions, the central dome (with a diameter of 15 Byzantine feet at Trilye) is raised on a cylindrical drum above pendentives, supported on four columns above a squarish naos. A tripartite sanctuary, partially preserved, extends to the east – the bema now a separate space from the naos – balanced by a narthex to the west. Although architectural developments in this difficult period may be credited to the rise of monasticism, notably in Bithynia, beyond individual churches, there are not surviving remains.
Robert G. Ousterhout, Eastern Medieval Architecture: The Building Traditions of Byzantium and Neighboring Lands (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019)