Giovanni Bellini, St. Francis in the Desert (or St. Francis in Ecstasy)

Giovanni Bellini, Saint Francis in the Desert (or Saint Francis in Ecstasy), oil on panel, c. 1480 (Frick Collection, New York City)

 


Smarthistory images for teaching and learning:

[flickr_tags user_id=”82032880@N00″ tags=”BelliniFrancis,”]

More Smarthistory images…

[0:00] [music]

Dr. Steven Zucker: [0:05] I’m looking at this gorgeous, subtle painting by Giovanni Bellini of the ecstasy of Saint Francis, but I’m not seeing the seraphim, I’m not seeing the gold rays, I’m not seeing all of the stage props of divinity that I expect to see.

Dr. Beth Harris: [0:20] [It] makes sense that we don’t see those things, because here we are around 1480, the Italian Renaissance is well underway, and the artists of the Renaissance are interested in interpreting moments from the lives of saints or stories from the Bible in fully naturalistic ways.

[0:38] And so that kind of obvious narrative, where we see the gold rays and we see Saint Francis so obviously receiving stigmata has been reinterpreted. This looks so natural. In some ways, we know what’s happening, but in some ways, it’s a landscape with a figure in it.

Dr. Zucker: [0:55] So a 15th-century viewer would have been maybe as perplexed as we are. They would have expected these things and they would have been able to, in a sense, imagine them because they had been so trained to see them.

Dr. Harris: [1:05] Instead of the seraphim and gold rays coming down, we have a sense of supernatural light coming from the upper left of the painting flooding down onto Saint Francis. His body is represented in browns and golds, but this little rocky ledge where he is is in shadow. He seems illuminated, but within this shaded environment.

Dr. Zucker: [1:28] That space is so cool and so beautiful, but he seems so warm. There is this sense of God’s love. Francis has stepped away from his office, he’s stepped away from his desk. There is this sense of the momentary, even though we might expect to see this rendered as a kind of eternal moment. He hasn’t even put his sandals on.

Dr. Harris: [1:47] We do have a kind of unfolding of time and we have a sense of a real person engaged in real activities in a real landscape.

[1:56] Francis is on a retreat. He’s in Mount La Verna and he’s there for prayer and meditation. We see his Bible and we see a skull, a memento mori, a reminder of death and the importance of repentance, and we wonder what’s made him rise suddenly, leave his sandals behind, and turn toward the light.

[2:17] Animals seem to be wondering what’s going on. A shepherd in the back might also be paying attention, but then also a sense of life continuing even while this miracle is happening.

Dr. Zucker: [2:29] In some ways, that seems so much more credible. That seems so much more possible, that this man who had only lived a couple of hundred years earlier could have actually left his desk, turned around and God’s presence could have flooded him. There is that sense that that’s the way it would have happened.

Dr. Harris: [2:44] That it wouldn’t have been little gold rays and seraphim flying through the sky.

Dr. Zucker: [2:48] That’s right, that nature is enough to represent divinity here on earth; but Bellini is really clever and he’s able to take that ambiguity and to fill this painting with symbolism. For instance, you have that sense of the momentary with the sandals left behind, but that also becomes a reference to Moses walking barefoot on the ground before God.

[3:06] There’s a very subtle way that Bellini is able to take this naturalism and imbue it with even more symbolism.

Dr. Harris: [3:14] This is something that he’s getting from the artists of the Northern Renaissance, this idea of imbuing the natural world with religious meaning. You might think of Campin’s “Merode Altarpiece,” where the objects on the table or the decorative forms on the furniture also have symbolic meaning.

[3:32] In Bellini’s painting, we could also look up at the grapevine that he’s cultivating that refers to the Eucharist — to the wine, the blood of Christ.

Dr. Zucker: [3:40] I see real parallels to Campin and the “Merode Altarpiece.” Not only in the concentrated symbolism that both artists use, but also in the attention to manufacture. That’s not just Campin, of course, it’s the entire Northern tradition, but look for instance at the desk.

[3:55] We can understand the construction, the carpentry, the physicality; that notion of the spiritual overlaying the physical is central.

Dr. Harris: [4:04] Right, and if you’re going to do that, then the physical has to be entirely believable. Many of the plants are identifiable by species. The cultivated plants that are near his work and living space were grown in a monastic environment, and the wild plants. Everything is painted with an enormous amount of care and clarity so everything is so believable.

Dr. Zucker: [4:26] It’s the beauty of the interrelation between the spiritual and the physical world. Beauty is infused with divinity and it is a central idea of the Renaissance. It is a central humanist idea.

Dr. Harris: [4:37] We see Francis, who’s only a small part of this whole landscape and townscape in the background that’s unprecedented.

Dr. Zucker: [4:46] This may be the most extensive treatment of landscape in the history of painting to this day.

Dr. Harris: [4:51] Can you think of an early example like this?

Dr. Zucker: [4:53] I can think of examples that are more schematic. Ambrogio Lorenzetti’s “Allegory of Good Government in the City and Allegory of Good Government in the Country.”

Dr. Harris: [5:01] That precedes this by about 150 years. Think about Van Eyck and the “Ghent Altarpiece,” where we have a whole Flemish city in the background, or in the background of the Joseph panel of the “Merode Altarpiece,” but it’s as though Bellini has enlarged that so it’s become the focus.

Dr. Zucker: [5:16] There’s something really different here, which is that the main figure — the protagonist, Saint Francis — has been diminished, or I should say, he’s enhanced not by his scale, but by his inclusion in this full world.

[5:29] It’s absolutely appropriate to Francis, who was associated with nature, for whom periodic ventures into the wilderness were a part of his life. [And] of course, who received the stigmata after taking the donkey that we see in the middle ground up to Mount La Verna.

Dr. Harris: [5:44] Francis is ennobled, or made divine by the landscape. The landscape enhances our understanding of his divinity, of his saintliness.

Dr. Zucker: [5:55] What an incredible expression of the humanism of the Renaissance itself, that is, that our natural world, the one that we inhabit, can potentially ennoble us.

Dr. Harris: [6:04] I get a real sense of dawn, a strong but subtle early morning light, flooding from the left onto that townscape in the background and especially in the hill town that we see up high amidst those clouds, which are also capturing the morning sunlight.

Dr. Zucker: [6:21] If you look at those clouds closely, it’s really this bravura brushwork.

Dr. Harris: [6:24] If you look to the very upper left at the brushwork, you can actually see paint that works across the clouds and forms a diagonal line that’s very subtle from that light in the upper left towards Saint Francis.

Dr. Zucker: [6:36] Well, that movement from upper left to lower right is continued through a linear perspective. Not anything precise, because we’re in a natural environment. We don’t have the right angles of architecture.

[6:46] But if you look, for instance, at the orthogonals, those three bars that help to steady the trellis, you can follow those right back to that source of divinity. The warm light of Francis seems to stand out so strongly, to make him such a potent figure in the foreground in comparison to the cool recessive colors that surround him.

[7:05] It’s interesting, because those cooler colors are what we would expect to see in the background. They would help lead our eye into the distance.

Dr. Harris: [7:12] With atmospheric perspective, that’s normally how we would see it.

Dr. Zucker: [7:15] That’s right, but here those cool colors function as a kind of frame for Francis.

Dr. Harris: [7:20] The image is remarkably subtle. We know that this is Francis, we know that this is a miracle, we know that Francis is receiving the wounds of the Crucifixion on his body.

[7:32] St. Francis lifts his eyes up, he opens his mouth, but there’s something about the subject and the miraculousness of what’s happening that makes one expect drama and pain, but instead it’s all very gentle and subtle and lovely.

Dr. Zucker: [7:46] This is a painting that is about light. Oil allowed Bellini to be able to create the sense of luminosity. This is Venice’s inheritance from the north. More than any Venetian artist of the 15th century, Bellini is able to take the great achievements of central Italy, the Italian Renaissance, and wed them to the innovations of the North.

[8:05] The miraculous is central to this painting, but the miracle is expressed through nature as a credible force.

[8:10] [music]

Cite this page as: Dr. Beth Harris and Dr. Steven Zucker, "Giovanni Bellini, St. Francis in the Desert (or St. Francis in Ecstasy)," in Smarthistory, November 18, 2015, accessed October 9, 2024, https://smarthistory.org/bellini-st-francis-in-the-desert-st-francis-in-ecstasy/.